今天华新头条贴，关于澳洲家务纠纷。
很多网友纷纷表示义愤填膺。
于是有人各种寻求出手。
比如：
http://www.weibo.com/1954349875/ChO9sp0Ar?type=repost#_rnd1431599883266
再比如：
http://bbs.huasing.net/sForum/zbbs.php?B=105_13136887
如果你人在新加坡，希望你考虑下新加坡2014年生效的防止骚扰法令。摘抄第三条如下：
OFFENCES
Intentionally causing harassment, alarm or distress
3.—(1) No person shall, with intent to cause harassment, alarm or distress to another person, by any means —(a)
use any threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour; or
(b)
make any threatening, abusive or insulting communication,
thereby causing that other person or any other person (each referred to for the purposes of this section as the victim) harassment, alarm or distress.(2) Any person who contravenes subsection (1) shall be guilty of an offence and, subject to section 8, shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $5,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months or to both.(3) In any proceedings for an offence under subsection (2), it is a defence for the accused person to prove that his conduct was reasonable.Illustrations
(a) X and Y are coworkers. At the workplace, X loudly and graphically describes to the other coworkers X’s desire for a sexual relationship with Y in an insulting manner. X knows that Y is within earshot and intends to cause Y distress. Y is distressed. X is guilty of an offence under this section.
(b) X writes a letter containing threatening words towards Y intending to send the letter to Y to cause him alarm. X decides not to send the letter and throws it away. Y finds the letter and is alarmed. X is not guilty of an offence under this section as he had no reason to believe that the letter would be seen by Y.
这条法规是新颁布的，大家所做的人肉行为会不会造成定罪目前没有定论。
但是小弟我本人是不希望看到华新的任何一个童鞋用这种方式为新加坡判例法做贡献（这个真的会名垂青史的）。
大家的心情我想楼主是理解并且很感激的。但是新加坡不是中国，有些事情做之前还是请三思。
以上。