申请法庭令(the STB under section 111(b) of the BMSMA)

2019-07-18 07:00
您好,我想咨询一下,因为我与公寓管理处的管理人员/委员会人员对于安装invisible grills有不同的看法,我前前后后共申请了近4次,他们一次一次拖延,加拒绝我们的申请。也没有提供有力的证据,以下是他们对我们的最近回复
Please be informed that any proposed improvement works to a unit that will affect the appearance of the facade of the building and structural integrity would require the approval of the management corporation (MCST) not the Management Council.  Due to the suggestion by BCA on the act, you could request a resolution to be tabled at a general meeting for the general body to collectively determine a set of guidelines / design for the installation of such grilles for adoption by all unit owners as to up keep the uniformity in appearance with the rest of the building in the development, or whether the MCST can adopt a few designs (including any existing designs).


我们已经通过email发给他们设计图,他们现在居然要求我们提供选项来解决整个公寓的安装相关grills的设计,我觉得挺无理了,我们一再阐述我们的理由是由于需要照顾孩子们的安全。他们一再将妨碍公寓的整体外观的理由提出来作为拒绝我们安装窗花的理由。这是我们无法接受的。这个争议已经来来回回有近1个半月,他们要求我们在年底会议提出动议,可是那意味着我们需要再等待至少6个月。
于是我们向BCA发去询问的email,他们的回复如下:you have recourse to apply to the Strata Titles Board (STB) under section 111(b) of the BMSMA for an order that the MCST consents to your invisible grilles proposal if the MCST has unreasonably refused to authorise it.



那么请问我要申请这样的法令,大约需要花费多少呢?可否将申请法令的相关费用找MCST claim回来?这样的法令申请需要律师介入吗?


介于以上情形,我是否可以采取,强行安装,如果他们发律师信,我会有什么后果呢?


谢谢

1 个回答

查看全部回答

2019-07-18 07:00

向初霞

不懂
但是感觉你自己装上,也没人管得了你。就算以后公寓告你也应该告不赢吧。worst case,拆掉咯。